.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to sacreligion.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="sacreligion:686106"]the_reverend said:[QUOTE]so what should the jail sentence be for jemkem users? cigarrette smokers? glue sniffers? alcoholics? cuase all that stuff will litterally kill you.[/QUOTE] that's more of a slippery slope though, because these are things that are already legal, so if you try to make one of them illegal people are gonna sprout up all over the place demanding other shit be criminalized because the public is an overzealous non-thinktank. all i'm disagreeing with this about is the fact that people who are addicted to crack are going to be let free and they'll go right back to smoking crack again. so obviously jail isn't the right way to handle their addiction. instead of giving them mandatory jail time it should be mandatory rehab/detox or whatever it'll take to help these people get off of said drug. even putting them in halfway homes where they have to pull their own weight but are still supervised is a better way to handle it than jail(because jail will just waste money to support them, and they'll end up back in again once they get out because all they learned was that jail will take care of most of their needs for free)[/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.003 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][