.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to sacreligion.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="sacreligion:686121"]i could live without it as it's not physically addicting, but i happen to enjoy it so i indulge regularly. this is where the slippery slope comes in though and it is the main argument against decriminalizing pot(that people who use other illegal drugs will want the same treatment). hence my NukeTW post in the other crack thread. i could go on all day about why i think pot should be legalized(frees up police forces, less money spent on incarcerating those who've been convicted, taxing it to help balance our falling economy) but in the end i'd be no different than a crackhead saying "legalize crack" so you inevitably come to a dead end. what i personally feel is that th process towards punishing those addicted to truly addicting drugs(crack, cocaine, heroin, meth) which are truly detrimental to your health should be changed to more awareness and rehabilitation. [/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.003 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][